simplyn2deep: (Hawaii Five 0::Danny::walking surf board)
simplyn2deep ([personal profile] simplyn2deep) wrote in [community profile] 1word1day2025-05-27 10:35 am

Tuesday word: Geyser

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Geyser (noun, verb)
geyser [ gahy-zer, -ser gee-zer ]


noun
1. a hot spring that intermittently sends up fountainlike jets of water and steam into the air.
2. British Informal. a hot-water heater, as for a bath.

verb (used without object)
3. to spew forth as or like a geyser: the kettle geysering all over the stove.

Other Word Forms
gey ser·al gey ser·ic adjective

Related Words
gusher, hot spring

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com

Origin: 1755–65; < Icelandic Geysir name of a hot spring in Iceland, literally, gusher, derivative of geysa to gush

Example Sentences
There’s geysers of gore and a skinhead who gets turned into a tiki torch.
From Los Angeles Times

The wellspring of this geyser of asininity is the simple fact that Trump doesn’t understand how trade works.
From Los Angeles Times

The smoldering conditions also caused pressure to build, resulting in geysers of hazardous liquid waste bursting onto the surface and white smoke seeping out of long fissures.
From Los Angeles Times

Another one gave way in rural Yancey County last week, sending a geyser dozens of feet into the air.
From Salon

Observations from Earth and orbiting probes suggest that some of this water works through fissures in the ice and blasts through in geysers over a hundred miles high.
From Los Angeles Times
minoanmiss: Minoan version of Egyptian scribal goddess Seshat (Seshat)
minoanmiss ([personal profile] minoanmiss) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2025-05-27 10:42 am

Two Ethics Quests from Ask A Manager

I am having trouble including the link, due to not being able to see properly. sorry about that.

1. Manager husband is cheating with a much younger employee Read more... )

2. My employee has terrible attendance issues … in this economy? Read more... )
smallhobbit: (Holmes Watson grass)
smallhobbit ([personal profile] smallhobbit) wrote in [community profile] allbingo2025-05-27 09:09 am

Blackout Bingo 2x2 Colour Fest

Title: The Curate's Education
Fandoms: Sherlock Holmes (ACD) - retirement era
Ratings: G
Pairings: Holmes/Watson
Prompts: Colour Blind; Rose Coloured Glasses; Yellowed Paper; Purple Prose

The Curate's Education on AO3
jazzyjj ([personal profile] jazzyjj) wrote in [community profile] awesomeers2025-05-26 09:29 pm
Entry tags:

Just one thing: 27 May 2025

It's challenge time!

Comment with Just One Thing you've accomplished in the last 24 hours or so. It doesn't have to be a hard thing, or even a thing that you think is particularly awesome. Just a thing that you did.

Feel free to share more than one thing if you're feeling particularly accomplished!

Extra credit: find someone in the comments and give them props for what they achieved!

Nothing is too big, too small, too strange or too cryptic. And in case you'd rather do this in private, anonymous comments are screened. I will only unscreen if you ask me to.

Go!
stonepicnicking_okapi: letters (letters)
stonepicnicking_okapi ([personal profile] stonepicnicking_okapi) wrote in [community profile] 1word1day2025-05-26 08:32 am

Monday Word: Paludal

paludal [puh-lood-l, pal-yuh-dl]

adjective

1. of or relating to marshes
2. produced by marshes, as miasma or disease.

examples

1. Unfortunately the investigations undertaken for this end have for a long time been fruitless, for the preconceived paludal theory has led investigators to occupy themselves exclusively with the inferior organisms inhabiting marshes. Scientific American Supplement, No. 458, October 11, 1884 Various.
2. The paludal deposits of Sarawak occur in large basin swamps and in small interior valleys that have developed in mostly near coastal areas in relatively recent times (Murtedza et al., 2002). Development of tropical lowland peat forest phasic community zonations in the Kota Samarahan-Asajaya area, West Sarawak, Malaysia

origins

Latin palud-, palus marsh; akin to Sanskrit palvala pond

paludal
thisbluespirit: (margaret lockwood)
thisbluespirit ([personal profile] thisbluespirit) wrote2025-05-26 10:35 am

Belated watching post

I found this sitting in my posts in progress from March, about what I'd been watching at the time, or some of it. I obtained the two small pieces of info it was lacking and have otherwise posted as-is, so it's probably fairly babbly, but I feel it is better to post than not to post. (At least with random mostly-complete media posts, that is.)

The Ghost Camera (1933) This was recced to me ages ago by [personal profile] sovay and I managed to snag it in passing on TalkingPictures TV, but then failed to watch it. (I have issues with watching all sorts of things still for reasons that are too stupid and annoying to go into, but they are all basically the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome being a pain.) But then, [personal profile] liadt sent me it on DVD as well! So having been recced it twice by two people who know what's what when it comes to elderly film and suchlike, I had to eventually consider putting it in the dvd player and watching it.

Anyway, as I mentioned before, I really enjoyed it! It was sweet and fun. The internet tells me it was an unexpectedly good 'Quota Quickie' and it is. A nerdy scientist accidentally acquires a camera with a dangerous set of photos inside it, develops them and sets out, while being dogged by the criminals who want it, to find out whose camera it is - starting with finding the woman in one of the photos. It's engaging, the hero is charmingly atypical and shy, and it really does do some cool things with experimental camera angles and techniques, some of which almost even come across like handheld camera in places.

It's very early UK film, so it doesn't have the polish that a lot of the US ones had acquired by even this point, but if you like old films, this is a fun and interesting one.


Dope Girls (BBC) s1 I've only watched half of this because it was too much for me, but I neverthless watched that much, because it looked fascinating and different and the sort of thing I would be all over if it wasn't so much about crime. I'm hopeless when people in fictonal things are routinely committing crimes, and this is very violent, lots of 'rave' type shooting of scenes, none of which I can cope with. Saying I watched it, given how much I used the skip 10s button is probably an exaggeration BUT it's really beautifully made and it's about women immediately post WWI, based on a true story of a woman who set up a Soho nightclub (given value of 'true' no doubt varies in the show). The series also follows her illegitimate mixed race daughter Billie, a dancer, her legitimate teenage daughter who's getting into spiritualism following her father's death, and Violet, one of the very first women in the police, who's sent undercover into the nightclub.

Warnings for pretty much everything ever: dodgy accents, murder, suicide, meat & butchery, drugs, sex, 'rave' type scenes, beatings etc. It seems to be trying to be the new Peaky Blinders but since PB happened while I was ill and also contains characters who routinely commit crimes, I can't comment on accuracy of media's "the new x" pronouncements.

In short, it looks great if only I weren't me. I might still finish it, unwisely, anyway. It's about women immediately post WWI! /o\


They Came To A City (1944) This is one I happened to catch on TalkingPictures TV just as [personal profile] sovay was talking about John Clements, and I realised I had accidentally snagged this, featuring him. It's adapted from a play by J. B. Priestley, who actually turns up in a little prologue with a wee Ralph Michael & Brenda Bruce to tell the story of the film as a fable to prove a point to them. The story within a story is of nine ordinary British people from different walks of life who find themselves transported to a mysterious city run by an apparently perfect sort of socialist ideal. Some of them hate it, some of them stay, and some of them return to their regular lives to try and make their own cities more like the City. It's very static and talky and we don't see the city, but they pretty much lifted the original play's cast into the film and the performances are great all round and always raise it when it gets too close to being too much just talking about the ideas. It's slow but I found it utterly fascinating and loved it. I had to leave it on the DVR, so I couldn't even delete it as watched!

Also it gave me all the feels about the Beveridge Report and I've never said that about a piece of fiction before.


The Ghost Train (1941) wiki tells me there are actually about nine different versions of this, originally a play by Arnold Ridley who I know as Godfrey in Dad's Army. This is the most comic version, I gather, but also the one that has villainous Nazis instead of unlikely Cornish communists. It was another one I snagged recently from TPTV and, encouraged by current watching ability, I gave it a try and enjoyed it very much indeed! It does occasionally veer towards becoming a vehicle for Arthur Askey but it recovers itself in time, although I would definitely be interested in seeing some of the other versions. But his role as comedian was written in very well (he's a seaside vaudeville performer, his antics cause the stranding & solve it, and everyone gets annoyed with him) and I liked everyone else very much. Another mixed group of strangers get stranded in a remote Cornish railway station - with a story about a ghost train that runs through the station.

Anyway, I had a lot of fun, and I'd definitely be curious to see a version played more straight, but like I said, this is the one that sends a bunch of Nazis off a railway bridge, so I don't feel that it was the worst place to start!


[May comment: still didn't go back to Dope Girls; the state of my brain when employing the iPlayer can be easily illustrated by explaining that what I did was to watch a series and a half of Malory Towers instead. XD]
jazzyjj ([personal profile] jazzyjj) wrote in [community profile] awesomeers2025-05-25 10:19 pm
Entry tags:

Just one thing: 26 May 2025

It's challenge time!

Comment with Just One Thing you've accomplished in the last 24 hours or so. It doesn't have to be a hard thing, or even a thing that you think is particularly awesome. Just a thing that you did.

Feel free to share more than one thing if you're feeling particularly accomplished!

Extra credit: find someone in the comments and give them props for what they achieved!

Nothing is too big, too small, too strange or too cryptic. And in case you'd rather do this in private, anonymous comments are screened. I will only unscreen if you ask me to.

Go!
brightknightie: Nick looking up. (Nick)
Amy ([personal profile] brightknightie) wrote2025-05-25 06:15 pm

FK Ficathon eve 2025...

Whew! The schedule is made and locked. [community profile] fkficfest '25 starts releasing tomorrow (Monday, May 26).

Gold stars to the community for collectively loading every story successfully with no help from me! If that has ever happened before, it's not leaping to mind, and this is our sixteenth annual game. I'm impressed!

To build our schedule, of course, I got my annual modly sneak peak into our stories, and while there are many trends and uniquenesses of all kinds -- which I will not spoil -- one meta curiosity really nabbed my attention. Of the 10 authors, only 4, including me, chose to hold the reveal of their chosen prompt for the story's endnotes. The other 6 chose to state the prompt up front in the story's preface. Intriguing! Different strokes for different folks.

thisbluespirit: (fantasy2)
thisbluespirit ([personal profile] thisbluespirit) wrote2025-05-25 08:27 pm

Starfall Stories 46

Two more [community profile] rainbowfic pieces, as I did let crossposting drop a way behind for a while:

Name: Hidden Lights
Story: Starfall
Colors: Beet Red #28 (Beg steal or borrow); Azul #30 (Token of strength or loyalty)
Supplies and Styles: Canvas + Pastels (also for [community profile] no_true_pair prompt March 26th - Leion & Pello at the beach) + resin (also for [community profile] allbingo May color fest square "true colors.") + Giftwrap + Triptych + Novelty Beads - https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/00/09/8b/00098b9d3a37c21ed8bd3ee00da58c7c.jpg (September Secrets 2020) + "Fire Opal" (Birthday prompts 2020) + Graffiti - for the May Parents challenge.
Word Count: 1918
Rating: PG
Warnings: Brief mention of possible death, risk of drowning, abandonment.
Notes: 1297-1306, Portcallan; Pello Ahblan, Joend Ahblan, Leion Valerno, Tana Veldiner, Tam Jadinor. (Introducing a new character who we're going to see more of in time. The end scene of this takes place immediately after the recent Atino and Leion sequence.)
Summary: Pello's fascination with starstone leads to an unexpected encounter on the beach at midnight.




Name: On the Trail
Story: Starfall
Colors: Warm Heart #7 (Calm)
Supplies and Styles: Thread
Word Count: 2692
Rating: PG
Warnings: None.
Notes: Portcallan, 1313; Viyony Eseray, Nin Valerno.
Summary: Leion has vanished.
mific: (cupcake-strawb)
mific ([personal profile] mific) wrote in [community profile] gluten_free2025-05-25 11:53 pm

Apple Nut Crumble (or any stewed fruit)

It's late Autumn and getting colder so I threw together a crumble topping for the big pot of stewed apples I'd made. It worked really well - mostly luck as I ad libbed it.

Apples
: washed, cored, chopped small but not peeled, stewed with a cinnamon stick and 3 cloves, a few squeezes lemon juice and raw sugar. Add as little sugar as possible so it's sweet, but still a little tart. Simmer well until the skins are soft, about 30 min.
(Equivalent vol. of about 8 Granny Smith apples although half of mine were sweeter red-striped ones)

Crumble:
1.5 cups rolled oats
1.5 cups rolled oats blended to a coarse flour
4 Tbsp butter, cut up and rubbed in until the mix is a crumble

Then mix in
0.5 tsp salt
1 cup shredded dessicated coconut
0.75 cup chopped walnuts
0.75 cup brown sugar

Remember to get the cloves and cinnamon stick out! (or use powdered spices). Top the stewed apples with crumble and bake for 30 min at 180C (355F) with a foil cover. Then remove foil and give it a last few min uncovered. I had it with cream, also great with Greek yoghurt. Or ice-cream if you like it sweeter!

This made 5 crumble serves and used about 1/2 of the apples - I had the rest of the apples with yoghurt for a few breakfasts.

jazzyjj ([personal profile] jazzyjj) wrote in [community profile] awesomeers2025-05-25 06:48 am
Entry tags:

Just one thing: 25 May 2025

It's challenge time!

Comment with Just One Thing you've accomplished in the last 24 hours or so. It doesn't have to be a hard thing, or even a thing that you think is particularly awesome. Just a thing that you did.

Feel free to share more than one thing if you're feeling particularly accomplished!

Extra credit: find someone in the comments and give them props for what they achieved!

Nothing is too big, too small, too strange or too cryptic. And in case you'd rather do this in private, anonymous comments are screened. I will only unscreen if you ask me to.

Go!
sallymn: (words 6)
Sally M ([personal profile] sallymn) wrote in [community profile] 1word1day2025-05-25 05:16 pm

Sunday Word: Legerdemain

legerdemain [lej-er-duh-meyn]

noun:
1 sleight of hand
2 a display of skill or adroitness

Examples:

In Open Eye's itsy-bitsy performing space, Sass has constructed a set filled with tricks and gimmicks: old-fashioned bulletin boards animate themselves, objects move on their own, characters appear from and disappear to unexpected places. Some of the legerdemain is how'd-they-do-that pieces of stage magic, while other bits are visual distraction. (Dominic P Papatola , Theater review: These 'Red Shoes' can't be tied with a bow. And that's a good thing , Twin Cities, March 2017)

Poirot reacts to all this legerdemain with a disbelieving scowl, even when he can't fully explain the hair-raising tricks his eyes and ears are playing on him. (Justin Chang, Review: With 'A Haunting in Venice,' Kenneth Branagh's Agatha Christie series hits its stride , Los Angeles Times, September 2023)

The magician on stage is all-powerful to the mesmerised audience, pulling the rabbit out of his hat, sawing pretty ladies in half, making members in the audience disappear and a host of other tricks in his legerdemain (Ravi Shankar, Why poll Houdini Prashant Kishor isn't a neta, The New Indian Express, February 2022)

Every little while he would bend down and take hold of the edge of the blanket with the extreme tips of his fingertips, as if to show there was no deception - chattering away all the while - but always, just as I was expecting to see a wonder feat of legerdemain, he would let go the blanket and rise to explain further. (Mark Twain, A Tramp Abroad)

He already sang as nobody on this earth had ever sung before; he practised ventriloquism and gave displays of legerdemain so extraordinary that the caravans returning to Asia talked about it during the whole length of their journey. (Gaston Leroux, The Phantom of the Opera)


(click to enlarge)

Origin:

early 15c, 'conjuring tricks, sleight of hand,' from Old French léger de main 'quick of hand,' literally 'light of hand.' Léger 'light' in weight (Old French legier, 12c) is from Latin levis 'light' (from PIE root legwh- 'not heavy, having little weight'). Main 'hand' is from Latin manus (from PIE root man- 'hand'). (Online Etymology Dictionary)

In Middle French, folks who were clever enough to fool others with fast-fingered illusions were described as leger de main, literally 'light of hand'. English speakers condensed that phrase into a noun when they borrowed it in the 15th century and began using it as an alternative to the older sleight of hand. (That term for dexterity or skill in using one's hands makes use of sleight, an old word from Middle English that derives from an Old Norse word meaning 'sly.') In modern times, a feat of legerdemain can even be accomplished without using your hands, as in, for example, 'an impressive bit of financial legerdemain.' (Merriam-Webster)

malinaldarose: (teenytinyTARDIS_snow)
malinaldarose ([personal profile] malinaldarose) wrote2025-05-25 06:12 am

Sunday Morning

I finally remembered to change the batteries in my thermometer's receiver unit! It's 41° this morning and it's supposed to get up to 60°. The forecast says that we might actually see some sun today...but there's still a chance of rain this afternoon, because of course there is. The long range forecast looks to be more of the same as far out as it goes: cloudy, rainy, cool. Maybe I should just dig into my winter clothes and get some long-sleeved shirts back out. And a couple of the sweatshirts that I packed away.

Yesterday was wet all day, as expected. I had thought I would go back out after I got home from my grocery run, after other stores opened, but my desire to be out of my house drained away with one single grocery run. I did do a bit of housework yesterday. Laundry and dishes, of course, but I also vacuumed -- as I said to the Paladin in our daily chat, it had been about a month since the last time. (I never claimed to be a good housekeeper.) I noticed that the filter gauge-thingy was indicating that the filter needed to be cleaned, so after I emptied the canister, I tried to get it open so I could rinse the filter...and I absolutely could not get it open. It's just supposed to twist off...though now that I think on it, I'm pretty sure that my last vacuum (which was the same basic model) had a latch and that part of the canister lifted off. In any case, I decided that if I can't get the damned thing open for basic maintenance then it's no good to me. So now I'm looking to upgrade. Not in a huge hurry about it, though; it'll be okay for light use for a bit. I am a bit pissed, though, as I bought that model specifically out of brand loyalty.

I am reminded of Scotty in Star Trek III: The more they change the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain.

Otherwise, I spent a lot of time online either reading fic or watching videos on YouTube. Except for the hour and a half or so in the afternoon that I took a nap with cats. I like taking a nap and having a snoozling cat tucked up under my chin. It's very pleasant.

It will be so much less pleasant in July. Unless this summer continues on like this, of course. Anyone know if a volcano has erupted anywhere recently?

I watched the Doctor Who serial "Time and the Rani" last evening. I was surprised to realize that I had seen it before. (Props to Kate O'Mara for her spot-on impersonation of Bonnie Langford.) I wasn't thrilled that it was four episodes long, but it does explain how Einstein became familiar with the Doctor and the TARDIS. (Well. Not explain really, but give a reason for that Eleven minisode with Einstein in it. Aaaaand never mind. Scurried off to YouTube to watch it and it was written by a bunch of school kids who very likely hadn't seen Time and the Rani.

Anyway, that was in preparation for watching last night's episode of current Doctor Who, which...was rather confusing to start. Read more... )

Today...I have no plans. We'll just see how it goes. Well, no. I lie. I do plan to listen to Wait Wait Don't Tell Me later this morning, but that's not for a few hours yet.
ysabetwordsmith: Cartoon of me in Wordsmith persona (Default)
ysabetwordsmith ([personal profile] ysabetwordsmith) wrote in [site community profile] dw_community_promo2025-05-25 01:06 am
Entry tags:

Birdfeeding

[community profile] birdfeeding is a community started on January 1, 2023. It's all about birdfeeding, birdwatching, and other topics relating to birds. It also touches on nature in general, and observations that may effect bird activity such as local weather. Both text and image posts are welcome.

Community resources include posts about birding events, nurseries that sell seeds or plants attractive to birds, bird identification apps, the benefits of birdwatching, and other useful materials. Check out the anchor posts from Three Weeks for Dreamwidth.


Recent posts:

Garden for Wildlife Month

Poem: "Birdsong" by Matt Merritt

Photos: House Yard

Photos: Prairie Garden

Baseball birds
Organization for Transformative Works ([syndicated profile] otw_news_feed) wrote2025-05-24 07:55 pm

TOS Spotlight: Ratings & Warnings

Posted by xeno

The Policy & Abuse committee (PAC) is responsible for enforcing the AO3 Terms of Service (TOS). To help users better understand the TOS, we’re posting a weekly spotlight series about the TOS and our policies. We’ll also be reading comments and answering questions on this and our other spotlight posts.


AO3 is a home for all fanworks and operates under the principle of maximum inclusiveness of fanwork content. We allow content of any rating, and all kinds of fictional topics, as long as the creator provides basic information about the intensity and type of content that may be present in a work.

PAC handles many different types of TOS violations, including incorrect ratings and Archive warnings. In this post, we’ll discuss the requirements for ratings and warnings as well as provide information on how to report works with incorrect ratings or warnings. We do our best to investigate every report, but incorrect ratings and warnings can take us a very long time to investigate if the report doesn’t contain enough information.

Don’t go looking for things to report.

Please do not start searching for works with incorrect ratings or warnings to report after reading this post. We know that these kinds of TOS violations are a problem on AO3. However, when people deliberately search for works to report, we end up getting a lot of duplicate tickets about works that have already been reported. Every ticket we receive is reviewed by a PAC volunteer, so we only need one report in order to investigate an issue. We know it seems like sites only respond to mass reports, but on AO3, duplicate and mass reports increase the time it takes our volunteers to investigate.

Ratings

All works on AO3 must have a rating. Creators can either select a specific rating (“General Audiences”, “Teen and Up”, “Mature”, or “Explicit”) or opt out of providing a specific rating by applying the non-specific rating “Not Rated”.

Our TOS divides ratings into two tiers: ratings that will trigger the Adult Content notification (“Mature”, “Explicit”, or “Not Rated”), and ratings that won’t (“General” or “Teen”). When you click on a work rated “Mature”, “Explicit”, or “Not Rated”, a banner will warn you that you’re about to access a work that may contain adult content. By selecting the “Yes, Continue” button on the banner, you are agreeing to access a work which may contain adult content. Registered users can disable this notification, which is enabled by default on new accounts.

Works rated “General” or “Teen” are not subject to this notification system. If a work rated “General” or “Teen” contains explicit content that you believe should trigger the Adult Content notification, you can report that work to PAC, and we will investigate whether that work needs to use one of the three higher ratings.

However, PAC doesn’t make any distinctions within these two tiers. This means that we won’t require a work rated “General Audiences” to be changed to “Teen and Up”, and we won’t require a work rated “Mature” or “Not Rated” to be changed to “Explicit”, or vice versa. We defer to the work’s creator(s) for those decisions: the only part we enforce is whether or not the work needs a rating that triggers the Adult Content notification.

Archive warnings

There are four specific Archive warnings: “Underage Sex”, “Rape/Non-Con”, “Graphic Depictions of Violence”, and “Major Character Death”. Any work on AO3 that contains content relating to one of the four specific Archive warnings must be tagged with either that warning or the non-specific “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings” label.

Creators can always Choose Not To Warn.

The “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings” (CNTW) label is a blanket warning. It means “Read at your own risk!” or “This work may contain any of the four specific Archive warnings.” If you don’t want to encounter content depicting underage sexual activity, rape/non-consensual sex, graphic violence, or major character death, then you should not click on works tagged with “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings”.

When you post a work, you can use the CNTW label if you don’t want to apply a specific Archive warning. For example, if you don’t want to spoil a plot twist by adding a “Major Character Death” warning, you can instead apply “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings” to your work. You can also apply a combination of CNTW and other Archive warnings. If your work contains rape and a major character death, and you want to warn for the former without spoiling the latter, you can label the work with both “Rape/Non-Con” and “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings”.

If you don’t Choose Not To Warn, then you may need to add a specific warning.

As mentioned above, you can always opt out of applying Archive warnings by instead selecting “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings”. If you do not select this label, then in the following circumstances, you must use one or more of the four specific Archive warnings:

The “Underage Sex” warning is required on works that depict or describe sexual activity involving characters under the age of eighteen (18). We don’t consider dating activities, like kissing, to be sexual content. Offscreen sexual content also doesn’t need a warning.

For characters that are underage in canon, we do not automatically assume (without evidence) that they are also underage in the fanwork. If there are no indications that a particular character is under 18, we will assume they are 18 or older. When evaluating works, we consider explicit statements of a character’s age as well as contextual clues (such as the work being clearly set in a time period where the character is underage). If you’re worried that a character in your fanwork may be misinterpreted as being younger than 18, you can always specify the character’s age in the tags, notes, or body of your work.

The “Rape/Non-Con” warning is required on works that depict onscreen rape or non-consensual sex. If the work only contains a reference to non-consensual sex, then we don’t require this warning to be applied. Additionally, there are circumstances that are not considered consensual in real life, but don’t necessarily require the “Rape/Non-Con” warning on AO3. For example, we don’t inherently require a “Rape/Non-Con” warning for adult/minor relationships (though we might require “Underage Sex” or CNTW). We also do not require a “Rape/Non-Con” warning for situations that are dubiously consensual, such as the Sex Pollen or Fuck or Die tropes. When in doubt, we defer to the creator’s judgement.

Similarly, the “Graphic Depictions of Violence” warning is only required if the work contains graphic violence that is explicitly shown “onscreen” in the work.

We require “Major Character Death” when the character is both a major presence in the fanwork and they’re dead by the end of the fanwork. We don’t take canon into consideration here – what we’re interested in is whether the character is a major presence in your fanwork. If you create a fanwork centered on a character that dies and stays dead in your work, that work should be warned for “Major Character Death” even if they only appear for one line in canon. If that same character dies before the start of your work, and dealing with the grief of their loss is a major part of the fanwork, “Major Character Death” is also required in this situation.

If your work features a character death and that character returns in a later chapter that is currently posted, then this warning is not required. However, if the character does not return to life until a sequel fanwork, the warning is still needed on the work in which they died. Archive Warnings apply to individual fanworks, not to series of works.

“No Archive Warnings Apply” may coexist with other warnings.

There is also a sixth label in this category: “No Archive Warnings Apply”. The best way to think of this Archive warning is as a placeholder. If “No Archive Warnings Apply” is the only Archive warning on a work, then it means that the work should not feature underage sex, rape/non-consensual sex, graphic violence, or major character death – or if it does contain such content, it is only a brief reference.

However, the “No Archive Warnings Apply” label can be present on a work that is also labeled with any or all of the other five Archive warnings. In that case, the other warning label always takes precedence. PAC never removes any Archive warnings already on a work. We only add the “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings” label to the work if it’s missing a required warning.

For example, some users may apply a “Major Character Death” warning and a “No Archive Warnings Apply” warning in order to emphasize that while the work may contain Major Character Death, it doesn’t contain any of the other warnings. The presence of “No Archive Warnings Apply” does not negate the “Major Character Death” label on the work – a major character death may still occur in this work.

If both “No Archive Warnings Apply” and “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings (CNTW)” are applied to the same work, then the CNTW warning is what takes precedence, and the work may contain content relating to any of the four specific Archive warnings. Some users may apply both the CNTW label and the “No Archive Warnings Apply” label for ambiguous situations, or to emphasize that while they don’t think the work contains something that needs a warning, it is open to interpretation. However, you should not assume anything about a creator’s intentions or the severity of content in the work – consider works warned with both CNTW and “No Archive Warnings Apply” the same way you’d consider works tagged with only CNTW or any/all of the specific Archive warnings.

We generally defer to the creator’s judgement.

For borderline cases, PAC will defer to the creator’s judgement. However, if we feel that a work depicts content clearly requiring one of the four specific Archive warnings, we’ll require the creator to either add the warning or opt out by applying the “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings” label.

Can I use Additional tags instead of Archive warnings?

Sometimes users include warnings in the Additional tags of their work. If the content is merely a reference or offscreen, this is fine. However, for any content requiring an Archive warning, the label must also be added in the Archive warnings category. For example, while you are welcome to include an additional tag of “rape” on your work featuring a rape scene, you still need to apply the “Rape/Non-Con” Archive warning (or CNTW).

Why does AO3 have only four required Archive warnings?

AO3’s warning system is deliberately minimal. When AO3 was created, these four warnings were chosen as a balance between the most common types of content that users wanted a warning for, and what would be feasible for PAC (a small team comprised entirely of volunteers) to enforce in a consistent and fair manner. We know that there are many other kinds of content that you might not want to see, so we encourage you to check out the additional tags, summary, notes, and bookmarks of a work before opening it. However, PAC will not enforce the use of tags or warnings beyond what is required by the TOS.

It’s what’s in the work that counts.

When it comes to ratings and warnings, we evaluate what is in the body of the work. If an author says in their notes that they plan to include explicit sex eventually, but the only chapter posted is a fluffy introduction with no explicit content, then we will not require that the work be given one of the higher ratings. Similarly, if a work carries an additional tag of “X dies at the end” but nobody actually dies in the work, then we will not require a “Major Character Death” warning.

Because of this, please do not report works based on what is in their additional tags or summary. Many creators may have begun works and added additional tags or notes based on their plans for future updates, but plans change, and not all works in progress are completed. Please only report works to us when there is actual content in the work itself that necessitates a rating or warning change.

Ratings and warnings are not promises.

AO3’s warnings and ratings both mean “may contain”, not “must contain”. If you want to rate your fluffy, non-sexy slice-of-life as “Explicit”, you’re allowed to do that. A higher rating means that a work may contain explicit content, not that it must contain such content. Similarly, if you want to warn for “Major Character Death” even though nobody has died, you’re allowed; we don’t ever make someone remove a warning.

What will happen if I get reported for having an incorrect rating or missing warning on my work?

First, we’ll review your work to confirm whether or not your work’s rating and/or warnings are insufficient. If we determine that the rating or warnings need to be changed, we’ll send you an email notifying you to update your tags.

We’ll only ever contact you by email, and only after we’ve already reviewed your work and confirmed that the current rating and/or warnings are insufficient. We will never comment directly on your work or contact you through social media. Please make sure to keep your account’s email address up to date and check it regularly (including your spam folder), or else you may miss our email.

If you don’t update your tags, we’ll change them. For an incorrect rating, we’ll set the work to “Not Rated”. For a missing warning, we’ll add the “Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings” label to the work. We won’t remove any of the warnings that are already on the work.

We don’t ever delete works for having insufficient warnings or ratings. While we do require all works to have appropriate ratings and warnings (as specified in the TOS), it is very rare for us to apply any penalties to a user’s account for insufficient ratings or warnings. We would usually only penalize a user if they undo changes we made or required them to make. A user may also receive a penalty if they repeatedly mislabel their works even after being contacted about similar violations, or for the purposes of harassment.

What should I do if I encounter a work that has the wrong rating or a missing warning?

You can give the creator a heads up by politely commenting on their work and linking to the TOS FAQ or this post. Alternatively, you can report the work to us.

How do I report a work with the wrong rating or missing warnings?

Although we ask that you do not deliberately seek out incorrectly tagged works to report, if you come across a work with the wrong rating or missing warnings while browsing, you can report it using the Policy Questions & Abuse Reports form, which is linked at the bottom of every page on AO3.

Please don’t report more than one user at a time or submit multiple reports about the same user. When reporting multiple works by the same user, please submit only one report with links to each work you’re reporting, so that all information about that user is in the same place.

Please tell us exactly where in the work the content requiring the higher rating or warning is. The best way to do this is to give us a short quote from the relevant scene that we can search for in order to immediately find the content. If you are reporting multiple works by the same creator, please group all the works into one report and provide this information for each work.

If the rating or warning issue pertains to a specific character, please tell us the name of that character as used in the work. If it’s Bert who died, please tell us it’s Bert, so that we don’t spend time trying to figure out if it was Ernie (who was only badly wounded). If you are reporting a missing “Underage Sex” warning, please tell us exactly where the underage sexual content occurs and where the indication of the character’s age is. As a reminder, if there are no indications that a particular character is under 18, we will assume they are 18 or older.

Rating and warning issues can take a lot of time for us to investigate if we’re not given clear information about where the violation has happened. PAC will not act unless we’ve confirmed a policy violation ourselves. If we’re sent a report about a work that is 80,000 words long and the report only says “contains rape”, we have to confirm that there is a rape scene somewhere in those 80,000 words before requiring a “Rape/Non-Con” (or CNTW) warning. If we can’t find it easily, the most likely result is that we’ll reply to you asking you to give us more info – and if you don’t, we’ll close your report with no further action. So please make sure to include as much information as possible when submitting a report.

For example, a report of a work with an incorrect rating might look like this:

Link to the page you are reporting: https://archiveofourown.org/works/00000000

Brief summary of Terms of Service violation: Incorrect rating

Description of the content you are reporting:
This work by USERNAME is rated G but it’s entirely smut from the very first sentence.

If you are reporting additional works, please include all relevant links and other information in your report description:

Brief summary of Terms of Service violation: Incorrect ratings and warnings

Description of the content you are reporting:
This work by USERNAME is rated G but it’s entirely smut from the very first sentence.

Some of their other works also have the wrong rating or warning:

https://archiveofourown.org/works/23456789 is rated T with No Archive Warnings Apply, but it has underage sex onscreen. CHARACTERNAME is 17 (in chapter 2 it says “after his seventeenth birthday party three weeks ago”) and has sex in chapter 4 (starting at “He stepped closer, leaning in…”)

https://archiveofourown.org/works/34567890 has the main character CHARACTERNAME die at the end (search for “She gasped in horror”), but the work isn’t tagged with Major Character Death or Creator Chose Not To Warn.

You can add more details if you like, but this example provides the basic information we need:

  • Who posted the incorrectly tagged work(s): Tell us their username or if the work is anonymous or orphaned.
  • Where we can find the work(s): Enter one URL in the “Link to the page you are reporting” field, and (if applicable) include links to any other violating works in the description of your report.
  • What violates the TOS: Explain why you think the rating and/or warning(s) on each work you’re reporting are incorrect, for example by including a quote from the relevant scene(s). A brief description of the work is fine; you don’t need to be very detailed or quote an entire TOS or FAQ section.

You’ll receive an automatic email confirming that we received your report, and our volunteers will investigate when they get a chance. Please be patient and do not submit another report about the same work. While PAC investigates every report we receive, it can take several months for us to process a report, and not every report will receive a reply.

What if I have more questions about ratings and warnings?

PAC follows a strict confidentiality policy. Therefore, while you are welcome to ask general questions in the comments of this post, we will not give information on specific cases, publicly rule on a work, or update you on the status of a report you have already submitted. Comments on this post that discuss specific works or users will be removed.

If you think you’ve found a work that’s incorrectly rated or missing a warning, or if you want to know whether a particular scene requires a specific rating or Archive warning, please report the work to us as described above. For more information, you can read our TOS FAQ on ratings and Archive warnings.

If you are still uncertain, you can comment below or submit a question through the Policy Questions & Abuse Reports form.

brightknightie: Midna, in imp form, and Link grin at each other (Zelda)
Amy ([personal profile] brightknightie) wrote2025-05-24 08:46 am

TLOZ:TwPr story concept: "The Bulbin Truce"

Probably this has been done, of course, but I just now thought of this The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess post-canon story possibility, and maybe it would be worth writing someday:

Up to a certain point near the story's climax, the audience and the characters all believe that the bulbins are monsters/demons, and nothing else. But in that particular scene, we see the Bulbin King speak -- literally speak, and in Hyrulean! -- for himself and make a different choice, and reveal his motivations, showing that at least he, and probably all his people, are, well, people. Not monsters, like all the monsters that cannot speak and cannot choose. At the very end of the game, we see the Bulbin King and a couple of other bulbins riding around, possibly hunting, possibly raiding, iirc, but definitely targeting animals, no longer people.

What is the journey from being perceived as monsters/demons to being perceived as just another of the diverse peoples of Hyrule? Is this a joint project of the TP characters and the Bulbin King? Zelda cannot successfully just order her people to stop hating and fearing bulbins; the Bulbin King may have the same problem with his people. Do the bulbins in the end settle in greater Hyrule and join society and maybe even produce sages someday, or do they turn out in the end to be from somewhere beyond Ordon, and return there? (Were they one of the surface peoples in the time of SkSw and became more monster-like over time? Were they monsters/demons who became people, a la what's-his-name in SkSw?)

Just thinking.

xandromedovna: purple unicorn with rainbow mane and text "usurpationcorn is pleased" (usurpationcorn)
Xavia ([personal profile] xandromedovna) wrote in [community profile] fic_rush2025-05-24 09:16 am
Entry tags:

Round 151 Poll

Poll #33157 Round 151 Dates
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 7


When should we have Round 151?

View Answers

30 May - 1 Jun
4 (57.1%)

6-8 Jun
3 (42.9%)

13-15 Jun
4 (57.1%)

20-22 Jun
1 (14.3%)

27-29 Jun
3 (42.9%)

who knows, I'm on Drag Queen Time in June
3 (42.9%)

I should be free sometime in 2058
3 (42.9%)

Tiquy Boxx
4 (57.1%)

the time has come for you to Rush for your life
4 (57.1%)